Workspace overview
One proposal, one evidence record, one history, and multiple role-aware ways to work.
Adaptive interview, missing decisions, research progress, and recommended next actions
Two interview answers can resolve the current scope decision.
12 support · 4 challenge · 2 conflicting · 5 contextual
Inspect evidence →of illustrative year-one cost has a likely funding source.
Review the gap →Pilot length, fare policy, rural feeder scope, and contingency funding.
Resolve a decision →What is being built
Late and rotating-shift workers report a recurring service-hour mismatch.
Verified sourcesThree illustrative employment corridors and two rural access gaps.
AI researchTransit authority controls service; county action may be needed for funding.
Staff review requestedOne formula source appears likely; match eligibility needs clarification.
AI researchVersion 2.4 contains six synchronized clauses.
Human-editedReliability, access, ridership, and cost measures proposed.
Expert review requestedResearching the funding match rule
Queued → searching → reviewing → conflicting sources → needs human review